The international community is calling on the United States to pay compensation to Iran following its recent military strikes on three major Iranian nuclear facilities — Natanz, Isfahan, and Fordow. The airstrikes, which shocked many nations, have been widely condemned as a breach of international norms and a dangerous provocation that could destabilize the region further.
Although no radioactive contamination was detected in neighboring countries such as Saudi Arabia, Qatar, and the UAE, concerns were initially raised about the potential for cross-border nuclear fallout. Saudi Arabia’s Nuclear and Radiological Regulatory Commission confirmed that radiation levels remained normal throughout the kingdom, and no leaks were found. This helped calm fears of a broader environmental disaster.
However, the deliberate targeting of nuclear infrastructure — even if not active — is seen by global leaders, legal experts, and human rights organizations as a reckless act. Many have pointed out that these nuclear facilities are recognized as part of Iran's civilian nuclear program, and therefore, are protected under international law.
As a result, there is growing pressure from the United Nations, the Non-Aligned Movement, and several European and Asian countries urging the US to take full responsibility and pay damages to Iran for the destruction caused. The compensation sought includes rebuilding costs, loss of research data, and disruption to peaceful nuclear development.
International nuclear safety experts have also warned that such military actions could set a dangerous precedent and lead to a new arms race or escalation in nuclear tensions.
Calls for restraint and dialogue are intensifying, with many world leaders emphasizing that the rule of law must prevail over unilateral military action. The demand for compensation is not just about monetary justice, but also about reaffirming the principles of sovereignty, peace, and international accountability.
As diplomatic efforts continue, the world watches closely — hoping this crisis will lead to stronger frameworks for nuclear security and peaceful coexistence, rather than further conflict.
