Another hot issue exploded in the people’s kitchens when, starting May 1, small traders were ordered to use purple commercial LPG gas canisters weighing 14kg and costing RM70.
This directive sparked various reactions, especially when compared to subsidized domestic gas canisters of the same size, but costing only RM26.
Many traders claimed that this move would increase operating costs and drive up food prices, which would ultimately be borne by consumers.
MCA President, Datuk Seri Dr Wee Ka Siong also questioned Petronas’ directive dated April 30 which banned the supply of subsidized gas to all commercial premises, including small stalls.
This action is seen to have caused panic among small traders who have been relying on subsidized gas for the continuity of their daily business.
More surprisingly, he raised the question of how a country that is proud to be the world’s fifth largest LNG exporter, is still unable to channel subsidies to small consumers who only use a few gas canisters a month.
Commenting on this confusion, the Minister of Domestic Trade and Cost of Living, Datuk Armizan Mohd Ali came forward to assure that no subsidy cuts or new policies would be introduced.
On the contrary, the government is actively implementing Ops Gasak — an integrated operation that only targets medium and large-scale industries that misuse subsidized gas cylinders.
However, a bigger question is beginning to arise, if LPG subsidies reach RM3.4 billion a year and the SST rate is now increased to 8%, where exactly is the national revenue being channeled?
Because in the end, the most vulnerable groups will also remain marginalized while continuing to pay the price for “savings” that they have never felt.
And if this purple gas directive is not enforced today, will it reappear tomorrow?
Everything remains one question — without certainty, without guarantee, that the fate of small traders will be defended in the coming days.
